Table of Contents | 1 |
Executive Summary | 4 |
Introduction | 8 |
Defining Quality of Life: From 2006 to 2014 | 10 |
Geographic Units | 16 |
Methods | 20 |
Cumulative Quality of Life Results | 21 |
Four Dimensions of Quality of Life | 27 |
Social Dimension | 28 |
Crime Dimension | 32 |
Physical Dimension | 36 |
Economic Dimension | 40 |
Appendix A: Technical Guide | A-1 |
Social Dimension | A-3 |
Crime Dimension | A-6 |
Physical Dimension | A-8 |
Economic Dimension | A-12 |
Profile Variables | A-14 |
Variable Methodologies: Comparisons Between the 2006 and 2014 Approaches | A-17 |
Appendix B: Neighborhood Profiles | B-1 |
Appendix C: Indicator Maps | C-1 |
Appendix D: Neighborhood and Subdivision Name Index | D-1 |
Tables | 2 |
Figures | 3 |
Figure 1. Neighborhood Statistical Area (NSA) Boundaries | 17 |
Figure 2. NSA Identification | 18 |
Figure 3. 2014 Cumulative Quality of Life Results | 23 |
Figure 4. 2014 Cumulative Quality of Life Results and High Priority NSA Identification | 24 |
Figure 5. 2006 and 2014 Citywide Quality of Life Results | 25 |
Figure 6. Social Dimension Results | 29 |
Figure 7. 2006 and 2014 Social Dimension Results | 31 |
Figure 8. Crime Dimension Results | 33 |
Figure 9. 2006 and 2014 Crime Dimension Results | 35 |
Figure 10. Physical Dimension Results | 37 |
Figure 11. 2006 and 2014 Physical Dimension Results | 39 |
Figure 12. Economic Dimension Results | 41 |
Figure 13. 2006 and 2014 Economic Dimension Results | 43 |
Figures 14-39. Indicator Maps | C-1 |